Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 F.3d 1327 - Price v. Time, Inc.

Price v. Time, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

416 F.3d 1327 · 2005

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Feliciano v. City of Miami Beach (2013), Nguyen v. United States (2009)

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

260200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Salve Regina College v. Russell · Branzburg v. Hayes · Salinas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts routinely and properly deny summary judgment on the basis of a party's sworn testimony even though it is self-serving.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While the scope of the 'any' adjective is plenty wide to sweep in all of the noun category that follows, it ordinarily does not sweep beyond that category. The term 'any dog' does not mean 'any dog or cat' unless a cat is a dog. Likewise, the term 'any newspaper' does not mean 'any newspaper or magazine,' unless a magazine is a newspaper. So, we are back where we started, looking for the plain meaning of the word 'newspaper.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.