Ramba Inc v. T’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Carrier Corp. v. Buckley (2009), Elementis Chromium Lp v. Coastal States Petroleum Company (2006)
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 547
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · United States v. Villanueva · Henderson v. Belknap · Southmark Corporation Southmark Corporation v. Schulte Roth & Zabel · Total Minatome Corp. v. Jack/Wade Drilling, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if it is plausible in the light of the record read as a whole.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.