Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 F.3d 621 - Haynes v. Barnhart

Haynes v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

416 F.3d 621 · 2005

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
March 2022
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Schmidt v. Astrue (2007), Elder v. Astrue (2008)

17 federal appellate ·

480200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Walker v. Bowen · Diaz v. Chater · Steele v. Barnhart · Ehrhart v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In rendering a decision, the ALJ must build a logical bridge from the evidence to his conclusion [but] need not ... provide a complete written evaluation of every piece of testimony and evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Sedentary work” is defined as involving lifting no more than ten pounds at a time and occasionally carrying articles such as docket files, ledgers, and small tools. Haynes v. Barnhart, 416 F.3d 621 , 627 n. 2 (7th Cir. 2005) (citing SSR 83-10). In addition, walking and standing are required only occasionally (no more than two hours in an eight-hour workday). Id. 2 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.