Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 FSUPP 1101 - Kew v. Senter

Kew v. Senter’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2003

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

801976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · United States v. O'Brien · Miller v. California · Steffel v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is difficult to conceive of ideas entitled to First Amendment protection which can be solely — or even best — expressed by baring the anus or genitals in the circumstances forbidden by the statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[R]egulation of indecent exposure and of conduct inducing to breaches of the peace are traditional and proper subjects of the police power ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.