Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 FSUPP 644 - Tasby v. Estes

Tasby v. Estes’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1991

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

50197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2701 · 42 U.S.C. § 2996 (Legal Services Corporation Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2996F

Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools · Thompson v. Madison County Board of Education · Brewer v. School Board of Norfolk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court in Bradley [v. Richmond School Board], 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 .. . (1974) approved the District Court’s allowance of the actual expenses of litigation, which included expenses for travel, hotel accommodations, restaurant meals, expert witnesses, investigation assistance, office supplies, transcripts (including those of depositions), and miscellaneous court fees. These were awarded in addition to ordinary costs of court .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.