State v. Stavig’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2008
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sloan v. Hicks · In re Disbarment of Sabiston · Porter v. United States · United States v. DeLuna · Carroll v. Alberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court’s discretion may be exercised at the expense of excluding relevant evidence “if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury....” SDCL 19-12-3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dale“A statement is not hearsay if it is offered against a party and is: [[Image here]] (5) A statement by a co-conspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tiegen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.