Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1801 (Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004)
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · 134 S. Ct. 2473 - Riley v. Cal. United States · State v. Lucero · Middleton v. State · State v. Catanio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“meaning . . . is susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.