Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 PA 437 - Commonwealth v. Patrick

Commonwealth v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
8
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 109 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Commonwealth v. Chester (1991), Commonwealth v. Peterson (1973)

12 federal appellate · 109 state decisions

5201965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Carnley v. Cochran · Commonwealth v. Kloiber · Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The practice of interviewing jurors after a verdict and obtaining from them ex parte, unsworn statements in answer to undisclosed questions and representations by the interviewers is highly unethical and improper and was long ago condemned by this court[;] ... [i]t is forbidden by public policy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Our Courts have repeatedly held for over 150 years that after a verdict is recorded, and after the jury has separated and been discharged, jurors may not invalidate or impeach a verdict by their own testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the consolidation or separation of indictments is a matter for the trial judge, whose conclusion will be reversed only for a manifest abuse of discretion or prejudice and clear injustice to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.