State v. De Anza Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2005
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 408 So. 2d 1091 - Leonard v. Leonard · 340 So. 2d 818 - Chandler v. Hunter · 398 So. 2d 865 - Kohl v. Bay Colony Club Condominium, Inc. · 466 F. Supp. 689 - Bennett v. Behring Corp. · 345 So. 2d 759 - State Ex Rel. Herring v. Murdock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Consumer transaction’ means a sale, lease, assignment, award by chance, or other disposition of an item of goods, a consumer service, or an intangible to an individual for purposes that are primarily personal, family, or household or that relate to a business opportunity that requires both his expenditure of money or property and his personal services on a continuing basis and in which he has not been previously engaged, or a solicitation by a supplier with respect to any of these dispositions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Procedural unconscionability relates to the individualized circumstances surrounding each contracting party at the time of contracting and cannot be established as a general proposition for a whole range of contracts merely containing similar terms between various persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a seller, lessor, assignor, or other person who ... engages in ... consumer transactions ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.