Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 So. 2d 545 - State v. Parker

416 So. 2d 545 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 956 So. 2d 758 - State v. Hill (2007), 445 So. 2d 1203 - State v. Rault (1984)

73 state decisions

3101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Prestridge · 389 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Douglas · 365 So. 2d 1319 - State v. Marse · State v. Landry · 404 So. 2d 907 - State v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here, the jury considered the medical evidence along with the lay testimony and the remainder of the evidence, and decided that the defendant had failed to prove by the necessary preponderance that he was insane or even intoxicated at the time of the offense. After viewing the record, we cannot say that the jury was wrong. A rational, objective fact-finder could well have concluded that the medical testimony, while scholarly, was largely based on defendant's self-serving revelations, and that it did not support the defendant's insanity plea. None of the testifying physicians had actually treated the defendant for any mental, emotional, or physical ailment. They were consulted only for the purpose of appearing as expert medical witnesses. Parker at 551 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant may rebut this presumption by showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he was suffering from a mental disease or defect which rendered him incapable of distinguishing right from wrong with reference to the conduct in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"The decision to assess mandatory life sentences for certain felonies is within the prerogative of the legislature."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.