Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 SO2D 6 - Potter v. Bolden

Potter v. Bolden’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1984
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 323 So. 2d 259 - Boardman v. Esteva · Lopez v. Holleman · Frink v. State Ex Rel. Turk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the witnesses painted a picture of promiscuous vote buying and other conduct on the part of certain individuals indicating intentional wrongdoing and gross negligence, all of which adversely affected the integrity of the election.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “before all absentee ballots cast in a single-county election may be declared invalid, there must be a specific finding of invalidity as to a sufficient number of ballots more than enough to change the result of the election.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “so conspicuously corrupt and pervasive that it ... tainted the entire absentee voting procedure in this election.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.