Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 SO2D 781 - Kerr v. State

Kerr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ross · New York v. Belton · Thomas v. State · Hamilton v. State · 52 Ala. App. 631 - Ludlum v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Because of the absence of any evidence of an ‘arraignment and plea’ or a showing of a satisfactory substitute therefor [see cases cited in Town of Gulf Shores v. Jones, 412 So.2d 1259, 1261 (Ala.Cr.App.1982)], the judgment and sentence of the trial court below must be reversed and this cause must be remanded to the trial court for a new trial_” (Citations omitted). Kerr v. State, 416 So.2d 781, 782 (Ala.Cr.App.1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.