Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 S.W.2d 129 - State v. Holbert

State v. Holbert’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably State v. Shaw (1982), State v. Johnson (1976)

2 federal appellate · 102 state decisions

600196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Reese · State v. Wynne · State v. Hepperman · State v. Hefflin · State v. Owens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If evidence of other crimes reasonably tends to prove a material fact in issue, it should not be rejected because it incidentally proves defendant guilty of other crimes.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. McDaris · State v. Jones
  2. ““ * * * that proof of the commission of separate and distinct crimes is not admissible, unless such proof has some legitimate tendency to directly establish defendant’s guilt of the charge for which he is on trial * * * ” Continuing, the court stated, “Exceptions to this general rule of exclusion are as well established as the rule itself. * * * ‘Generally speaking, evidence of other crimes is competent to prove the specific crime charged when it tends to establish (1) motive; (2) intent; (3) the absence of mistake or accident ; * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. McDaris

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.