Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 416 SW2D 229 - Drennen v. Wren

Drennen v. Wren’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2019

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

70196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Evergreens v. Nunan · State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Coughran · Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co. · State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Craig · 224 Mo. App. 285 - Finkle v. Western Automobile Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognize that certain issues between insurer and insured, e.g., fraud in the procurement of the policy or breach of an essential condition, are not litigable in the main case against the insured in a negligence action * * * and that such issues would survive inter partes an adverse judgment in the main suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.