¶1OPINION
¶2In this original habeas corpus proceeding petitioner attacks the legality of his confinement under the judgment of conviction this day reversed and remanded in Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 416 S.W.2d 412.
¶3The petitioner is legally confined to await the disposition of such appeal, the issuance of mandate and to answer the indictment charging him with murder.
¶4The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.