Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 A2D 948 - Styler v. State

Styler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Hughes v. State (1981), Weber v. State (1988)

1 district · 37 state decisions

1601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Griffin v. California · Sheppard v. Maxwell · McDonald v. Pless · Jenkins v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]urors would be harassed and beset by the defeated party in an effort to secure from them evidence of facts which might establish misconduct sufficient to set aside a verdict. If evidence thus secured could be thus used, the result would be to make what was intended to be a private deliberation, the constant subject of public investigation; to the destruction of all frankness and freedom of discussion and conference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.