Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 A2D 987 - State v. Grant

State v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2013

4 state decisions

201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A person is guilty of robbery if he commits or attempts to commit theft and at the time of his actions: B. He threatens to use force against any person present with the intent (2) to compel the person in control of the property to give it up or to engage in other conduct which aids in the taking or carrying away of the property; Section 353 of the Criminal Code provides: 1. A person is guilty of theft if he obtains or exercises unauthorized control over the property of another with intent to deprive him thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.