Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 BR 836 - In Re Foskey

In Re Foskey’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
September 2010
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Rexnord Holdings, Inc. v. Bidermann · Moody v. Amoco Oil Co. · Soares v. Brockton Credit Union · Musso v. Ostashko · Rodgers v. County of Monroe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The deed here did not impair title to property of the estate. Although a debtor may retain some incidents of ownership after entry prepetition of a District of Columbia tax sale judgment (for example, a limited right of posses sion), the delivery of the deed does not impair any of the debtor’s rights as the debtor’s previous full ownership of the property had been converted by the judgment to a right of enjoyment subject to divestment by way of the purchaser’s exercising its rights under its purchase commitment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.