Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 F.2d 103 - United States v. Baca

United States v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis

417 F.2d 103 · 1969

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably United States v. Harflinger (1970), United States v. Mulligan (1973)

31 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

260196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Chimel v. California · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Preston v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We accept the finding of the district court that the two vials and wrapped parphernalia [sic] were in plain sight and that a crime other than the one called for by the parole violation warrant was openly being committed. As the Court in Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States, supra [ 282 U.S. 344 , 51 S.Ct. 153 , 75 L.Ed. 374 ], pointed out, things which are visible and accessible and in the offender’s immediate custody can be seized by the police officers as was done in Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192 , 48 S.Ct. 74 , 72 L.Ed. 231 . * * * [T]his justifies * * * the seizure of the two vials and the narcotics paraphernalia * * *. 417 F.2d at 105 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.