Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 F.2d 340 - Santos v. United States

Santos v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

417 F.2d 340 · 1969

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 1997 · most notably United States v. Scott (1970), 3 Cal. 3d 404 - In Re Johnson (1970)

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2201969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Stovall v. Denno · Fay v. Noia · Leary v. United States · Marchetti v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It shall be unlawful for any person who is a transferee of [marihuana] required to pay the transfer tax imposed by section 4741(a)— (1) to acquire or otherwise obtain any marihuana without having paid such tax, or (2) to transport or conceal, or in any manner facilitate the transportation or concealment of, any marihuana so acquired or obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.