Dr. Werner Oswald v. Jane B. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
417 F.2d 43 · 1969
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2003 · most notably Reprosystem, B.V. v. SCM Corp. (1984), Colfax Envelope Corp. v. Local No. 458-3M, Chicago Graphic Communications International Union (1994)
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. · Marks v. . Cowdin · Brause v. Goldman · Solin Lee Chu v. Ling Sun Chu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * some note or memorandum in writing signed by the party to be charged or his agent in that behalf, sufficient to indicate that a contract to sell or a sale has been made between the parties and showing the quantity of goods sold or contracted to be sold. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to a contractual status on terms in a writing supplied by a plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roulley v. Inex Co.“Mr. Cantarella and I have arranged to go to Newburgh Friday, April 24.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.