Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 F.2d 645 - Riccardi v. Perini

Riccardi v. Perini’s Empirical Analysis

417 F.2d 645 · 1969

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 1973
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““According to Terry a ‘stop and frisk’ type of search must be justified from its inception. We do not think the officers had sufficient information to reasonably justify stopping the appellee and we are unwilling to extend: the doctrine of Terry to cover the circumstances of such a case. “Barring a ‘stop and frisk’ search on mere suspicion the officers, in order to support a lawful search, would have to have had, at the time they stopped the appellee, probable cause to believe that he had committed or was committing an offense. * # *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.