Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

417 F.2d 781

Docket No. 27147.

Caplan v. Johnson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 7, 1969.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-10-07

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1969-10-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1990

3 federal appellate ·

201969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*782B. E. Hendricks, Miami, Fla., Edward B. Hayes, Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, Ill., Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, Fla., for appellants-cross-appellees.

¶2Paul C. Huck, Miami, Fla., William S. Frates, Larry S. Stewart, Frates, Fay, Floyd & Pearson, Miami, Fla., for appel-lees-cross-appellants.

¶3Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5On due consideration of the petition of Underwriters at Lloyds, London, appellants and cross appellees, for a rehearing of this Court’s order of August 14, 1969 denying their petition for rehearing, and of the objection of George Caplan, Solomon Caplan and Albert Caplan, appellees, to the filing of said petition for rehearing, the petition for rehearing is hereby denied.

¶6On consideration of the motion of George Caplan, Solomon Caplan and Albert Caplan, appellees, that the Court award reasonable attorney’s fees, pursuant to Florida Statute § 627.0127, F.S.A., for services in defending this appeal and for briefing the same in this Court, and of the memorandum of Underwriters at Lloyds, London, appellants, in opposition thereto, the motion is hereby granted and the Court fixes the additional attorney’s fees due for services in this Court at the sum of $1,500.

/417/f2d/781 · .json · Public domain