Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 F.2d 84 - Fox v. United States

Fox v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

417 F.2d 84 · 1969

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
6
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. Weiner (1978), University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp. (1974)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

1401969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 334 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)

Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Mattox v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · Penn General Casualty Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Schnader · Bradley Palmer v. State of Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has long been well settled that the affidavit of a juror is admissible to show the true verdict or that no verdict was reached at all.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.