Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 F.3d 1006 - No. 03-3423

No. 03-3423’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Perez v. Forest Laboratories, Inc. (2012), Lange v. Mutual of Omaha Bank (In Re Negus-Sons, Inc.) (2011)

4 district · 1 state decisions

270200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A. · Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson · Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp. · Gaming Corporation of America v. Dorsey & Whitney Dorsey & Whitney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]ourts must look at the originating entity (the bank), and not the ongoing assignee ... in determining whether the NBA applies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In actions against national banks for usury, [sections 85 and 86] supercede both the substantive and the remedial provisions of state usury laws and create a federal remedy for overcharges that is exclusive, even when a state complainant *** relies entirely on state law. Because [sections] 85 and 86 provide the exclusive cause of action for such claims, there is, in short, no such thing as a state-law claim of usury against a national bank.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.