Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 F.3d 268 - Yan Chen v. Gonzales

Yan Chen v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis

417 F.3d 268 · 2005

Citation profile

1,843
cited by 1,843 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

79 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,843 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Zehatye v. Gonzales (2006), Jian Hui Shao v. Mukasey (2008)

79 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1.0k0200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Secaida-Rosales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Diallo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chen v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Cited together with Paul v. Gonzales · Zhang v. Gonzales · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Secaida-Rosales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Weng v. Holder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,843 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “becomes the basis for judicial review of the decision of which the alien is complaining.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reasonable, substantial and probative evidence in the record.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the BIA adopts the decision of the IJ and merely supplements the IJ's decision,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.