Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 F.3d 353 - Gulf Insurance Company v. Glasbrenner 04-0070-

Gulf Insurance Company v. Glasbrenner 04-0070-’s Empirical Analysis

417 F.3d 353 · 2005

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 18 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Phillips v. Audio Active Ltd. (2007), Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine (2005)

7 federal appellate · 18 district · 1 state decisions

610200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leroy v. Great Western United Corp. · Olberding v. Illinois Central Railroad · Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Naughton · Sunward Electronics, Inc. v. McDonald · Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc. v. Martino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “courts have 'looked to such factors as where the contract was negotiated or executed, where it was to be performed, and where the alleged breach occurred.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of [venue].'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.