United States v. Prochner’s Empirical Analysis
417 F.3d 54 · 2005
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Campa (2008), United States v. Perazza-Mercado (2009)
33 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Zannino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant's offense, history, and characteristics; (2) the need to deter the defendant from further criminal conduct; (3) the need to protect the public from further crimes by the defendant; and (4) the effective educational, vocational, medical, or other correctional treatment of the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“cause no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary to achieve the goals of supervised release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there [was] (1) an error (2) that is plain, and that the error (3) affects substantial rights and (4) seriously impairs the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.