Pointer v. DART’s Empirical Analysis
417 F.3d 819 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on O'Dell v. Hercules Inc. · Manning v. Lockhart · Miscellaneous Docket # 1 v. Miscellaneous Docket # 2 · Roberts v. Shawnee Mission Ford, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pointer v. DART, 417 F.3d 819, 822 (8th Cir.2005) (citation omitted); see also Fed.R.Evid. 103(a). Moreover,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would be likely to produce a different result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.