417 F. Supp. 913 - Norwick v. Nyquist’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 502 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Shapiro v. Thompson · Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person shall be employed or authorized to teach in the public schools of the state who is . . . [n]ot a citizen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ambach v. Norwick“seems repugnant to the very heritage the State is seeking to inculcate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ambach v. Norwick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.