Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 Md. 678 - State v. Cates

State v. Cates’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

2 district · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Anderson Nat Bank v. Luckett · Robeson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o particular procedure is required in all cases. 'On the contrary, due process is flexible and calls only for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands. Procedures adequate under one set of facts may not be sufficient in a different situation .'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “minimum requirements of procedural due process are 'notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.