Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 Md. 740 - Menefee v. State

Menefee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

4 district · 22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mills v. Green · Lockshin v. Semsker · Barbre v. Pope · Reyes v. Prince George's County · State v. Lancaster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the issue relating to the limitations period for submitting a claim to the Treasurer was not briefed by either party, it is not, at present, before this Court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In reviewing the Circuit Court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, “our task is confined to determining whether the trial court was legally correct in its decision to dismiss.” Washington Suburban Sanitary Comm’n v. Phillips, 413 Md. 606, 618 , 994 A.2d 411, 418 (2010) (quoting Debbas v. Nelson, 389 Md. 364, 372 , 885 A.2d 802, 807 (2005)); see Fioretti v. Md. State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs, 351 Md. 66, 71 , 716 A.2d 258, 261 (1998); Shenker v. Laureate Educ., Inc., 411 Md. 317, 334 , 983 A.2d 408, 418 (2009) (“We review the grant of a motion to dismiss as a question of law.”); Price v. Upper Chesapeake Health Ventures, Inc., 192 Md.App. 695, 702 , 995 A.2d 1054, 1058 (2010), cert. denied, 415 Md. 609 , 4 A.3d 514 (2010).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.