417 N.J. Super. 251 - State v. Lyons’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Osborne v. Ohio · Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of Manalapan · DiProspero v. Penn · Merin v. Maglaki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a trial court's discretionary decision is based upon a misconception of the law, a reviewing court owes that decision no particular deference.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the context of this statute, these terms commonly mean the act by which one person makes known to another that he or she may have for the taking an item possessed by the offeror.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In the context of [a peer-to-peer sharing] program, placing a file in a shared folder with descriptive text is clearly an offer to distribute the file.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Rowe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.