Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 P.2d 316 - Peyton v. McCaslin

Peyton v. McCaslin’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably 120 Wash. 2d 538 - Baker v. Leonard (1993), United States Department of Energy v. Seneca Oil Co. (1990)

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

1301966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCoy v. McCoy · Teuscher v. Gragg · Draughon v. Wright · Rollow v. Taylor · Royston v. Besett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * The onus of establishing a constructive trust lies upon him who seeks its enforcement, and before a court will be warranted in making a decree therefor, the evidence must he clear, unequivocal and decisive. But each trial, like each case, must be considered in the light of its own peculiar developments and circumstances, and, accordingly, the rule must be applied intelligently. As the well-known axiom states, the preponderance of the evidence does not mean the greater number of witnesses testifying to a fact, but means that which, to the mind of the trier of the fact, or the seeker of the truth, seems most convincing and more probably true.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““When the circumstances surrounding the acquisition of money by a surviving joint tenant in a joint bank account are such as to indicate that the beneficial interest in the money is not to go with the surviving joint tenant’s legal title, and that a third person may have a valid beneficial interest in said money, equity will be invoked to ascertain the status of the subject of the dispute and the relative rights of the contendors therefor.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If one obtains the legal title to property by fraud or by violation of confidence or fiduciary relationship, or in any other unconscientious manner so that he cannot equitably retain the property which really belongs to an other, equity carries out its theory of a double ownership, equitable and legal, by imposing a constructive trust upon the property in favor of the one who is in good conscience entitled to it, and who is considered in equity as the beneficial owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.