Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 Pa. Super. 172 - Farrell v. Lechmanik, Inc.

417 Pa. Super. 172 - Farrell v. Lechmanik, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2016

12 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Karis v. Karis · Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp. · Wenger v. Ziegler · 354 Pa. Super. 291 - Vogel v. Berkley · Unit Vending Corp. v. Lacas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, releases encompass only such matters as may fairly be said to have been within the contemplation of the parties when the release was given.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.