417 Pa. Super. 393 - Soncini v. Soncini’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 251 Pa. Super. 108 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wasiolek v. Wasiolek · 371 Pa. Super. 248 - Ryan v. DeLong · 287 Pa. Super. 296 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Vona v. Stickley · 390 Pa. Super. 226 - King v. King · 407 Pa. Super. 629 - Riccelli v. Forcinito
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When modification of a child support order is sought, the moving party has the burden of proving by competent evidence that a material and substantial change of circumstances has occurred since the entry of the original or modified order. The lower court must consider all pertinent circumstances and base its decision upon facts appearing in the record which indicate that the moving party did or did not meet the burden of proof as to changed conditions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.