Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

417 S.C. 112

In re McMillian

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 4, 2016

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2016-08-04

Relies on In re McMillian

Decided 2016-08-04

¶1ORDER

¶2By opinion dated June 26, 2013, the Court definitely suspended petitioner from the practice of law for three (3) years, retroactive to February 22, 2013, the date of his interim suspension. In the Matter of McMillian, 404 S.C. 117, 744 S.E.2d 579 (2013). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

¶3*113After thorough consideration of the entire record, the Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.s/Donald W. Beatty, J.s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

¶4We would deny the Petition for Reinstatement.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.s/John Cannon Few, J.
/417/sc/112 · .json · Public domain