Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 SO2D 1095 - Rudolph v. Unger

Rudolph v. Unger’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2005

5 state decisions

30198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 354 So. 2d 362 - Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'N · 43 So. 2d 704 - McCord v. Smith · 123 So. 2d 745 - Lendsay v. Cotton · Stone v. Town of Mexico Beach · 220 So. 2d 355 - Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A] civil action arising out of the provisions” of Section 701.04, the express predicate to the recovery of attorney’s fees, is necessarily confined to one brought by a person who has fully paid an outstanding mortgage, lien or judgment, but despite such payment is compelled to sue to obtain a satisfaction in order, in the usual case, to remove the cloud on the title caused by the previously recorded mortgage, lien or judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.