State v. Smelt’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Peltier · 297 So. 2d 836 - Brennan v. RYTER · 90 So. 2d 118 - Joyner v. City of Lakeland · 291 So. 2d 262 - Booze v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]nd there is now being kept on said premises certain COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND BUSINESS RECORDS which is [sic] being kept and used in violation of the Laws of the State of Florida, to-wit: the Laws prohibiting GRAND THEFT, F.S.S. 812.014 and DEALING IN STOLEN PROPERTY, F.S.S. 812.019. That the facts tending to establish the grounds for this application and the probable cause of affiant believing that such facts exist are as follows: EXHIBIT "B" WHICH IS INCORPORATED AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR ALL PURPOSES.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wade“Incorporation by reference is a perfectly acceptable means of avoiding the repetition of language set forth elsewhere. Any officer armed with this warrant, to which the affidavit was attached and, by the issuing judge, made a part of the warrant, could go unerringly to the property and seize the property particularly described. Joyner v. City of Lakeland, Fla. 1956, 90 So.2d 118 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.