Scott v. Kimerling’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2015
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Opinion of the Clerk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any party may-appeal from a final judgment of the district court -in a civil case by filing notice of appeal in the district court, within 14 days from the date of the judgment or the denial of a posttrial motion, whichever is later, ... together with security for costs as required by law or rule.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Any filing for which there is no express cost under the consolidated fee structure shall be treated as an original filing for cost purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Finch v. Finch“refuse[d] to post any bond or pay any money to enjoy [the] right to trial by jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Finch v. Finch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.