Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 SO2D 433 - Templet v. Johns

Templet v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably LaBove v. Theriot (1992), Rhodes v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. (1995)

26 state decisions

1301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Walgreen Louisiana Co. · 371 So. 2d 389 - Schlumbrecht v. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ETC. · Montgomery v. American Motorists Insurance Co. · 347 So. 2d 318 - Shotts v. Doe · Echelard v. Lambert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The La.Code of Civ.P. provides that the only rights available to a party whose suit has been dismissed is to request a new trial or to appeal. It is abundantly clear that a trial court can not change or alter this by improvidently signing an order to allow the filing of a supplemental and amending petition."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"After rendition of final judgment, the Code of Civil Procedure clearly spells out the rights of the appellants. They may either apply for new trial or appeal from an adverse judgment. No where in the Code is the amendment of a dismissed petition after final judgment allowed."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.