417 So. 2d 608 - Tate v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · 401 So. 2d 248 - Serritt v. State · 401 So. 2d 276 - Hobbs v. State · 401 So. 2d 241 - Matthews v. State · 394 So. 2d 967 - Inglish v. United Services General Life Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, despite the violation of due process standards, the prosecution can establish by clear and convincing evidence that the in-court identification testimony, rather than stemming from the unfair pretrial confrontation, has an independent source, the in-court testimony need not be excluded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The failure to make a timely objection waives the right to question the jury's qualifications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fisher v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.