Caraway v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““We interpret the right to counsel as the right to effective counsel. We interpret counsel to mean not errorless counsel, and not counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, but counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance.””

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hernandez v. State · Fuller v. State

2. ““As no two men can be exactly alike in the practice of the [legal] profession, it is basically unreasonable to judge an attorney by what another would have done, or says he would have done, in the better light of hindsight.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Fuller v. State · Moreno v. State

3. “(a) A jury being impaneled in any criminal action, except as provided by Subsection (b) of this article, the cause shall proceed in the following order: 1. The indictment or information shall be read to the jury by the attorney prosecuting. When prior convictions are alleged for purposes of enhancement only and are not jurisdictional, that portion of the indictment or information reciting such convictions shall not be read until the hearing on punishment is held as provided in Article 37.07. 2. The special pleas, if any, shall be read by the defendant’s counsel, and if the plea of not guilty is also relied upon, it shall also be stated. 3. The State’s attorney shall state to the jury the nature of the accusation and the facts which are expected to be proved by the State in support thereof. 4. The testimony on the part of the State shall be offered. 5. The nature of the defenses relied upon and the facts expected to be proved in their support shall be stated by defendant’s counsel. 6. The testimony on the part of the defendant shall be offered. 7. Rebutting testimony may be offered on the part of each party. 8. In the event of a finding of guilty, the trial shall then proceed as set forth in Article 37.07. (b) The defendant’s counsel may make the opening statement for the defendant immediately after the attorney representing the State makes the opening statement for the State. After the defendant’s attorney concludes the defendant’s opening statement, the State’s testimony sha”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Dunn v. State