Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 417 U.S. 733 - Parker v. Levy

Parker v. Levy’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

3,674
cited by 3,674 later decisions
103
cited 103 times by the Supreme Court
44
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

936 federal appellate · 246 district · 995 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,674 later decisions (103 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Wolff v. McDonnell (1974), Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982)

936 federal appellate · 246 district · 995 state decisions — followed in 44 states

1.1k0197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedLevy v. Parker (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 815 · 10 U.S.C. § 889 · 10 U.S.C. § 890 · 10 U.S.C. § 892 · 10 U.S.C. § 893 · 10 U.S.C. § 908 · 10 U.S.C. § 910 · 10 U.S.C. § 912

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Screws v. United States

Cited together with Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Smith v. Goguen · United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,674 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One to whose conduct a statute clearly applies may not successfully challenge it for vagueness.”
    61 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While the members of the military are not excluded from the protection granted by the First Amendment, the different character of the military community and of the military mission requires a different application of those protections. The fundamental necessity for obedience, and the consequent necessity for imposition of discipline, may render permissible within the military that which would be constitutionally impermissible outside it.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a specialized society separate from civilian society,”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.