Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 A.2d 1039 - Clark v. Moler

Clark v. Moler’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably District of Columbia v. Evans (1994), Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & Associates (1985)

32 state decisions

1301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sweet v. United States · Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R. · Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Consolidated Masonry & Fireproofing, Inc. v. Wagman Construction Corp. · Olson v. Stone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Mistakes; inadvertence; excusable neglect; newly discovered evidence; fraud, etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the Court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2)newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.