Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 A2D 1097 - State v. John W.

State v. John W.’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
13
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

6 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably State v. Read (1996), City of Farmington v. Fawcett (1992)

6 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Miller v. California · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n a public or private place ... knowingly accosts, insults, taunts or challenges any person with offensive, derisive or annoying words, or by gestures or other physical conduct, which would in fact have a direct tendency to cause a violent response by an ordinary person in the situation of the person so accosted, insulted, taunted or challenged ....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““[A] court [must] make its own inquiry into the imminence and magnitude of the danger said to flow from the particular utterance and then to balance the character of the evil, as well as its likelihood, against the need for free and unfettered expression. The possibility that other measures will serve the State’s interests should also be weighed.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “against governmental encroachment on their freedom of speech.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.