Schultz v. Instant Handling, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
418 F.2d 1019 · 1969
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2016
15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · Kirschbaum v. Walling US Arsenal Bldg Corporation · Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co. · Anderson v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendants' employees who remove liquid waste from the premises of concerns engaged in the production of goods for commerce perform work which is a closely related occupation directly essential to the industrial firm's production of goods for commerce. Therefore, those employees are engaged in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of Section 3(j) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 203(j)). 11 "The work performed by defendants' employees is directly and vitally related to a functioning of an instrumentality of commerce. Therefore, the employees are engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 3(b) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 203(b)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brennan v. Carrasco“engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“essential to the continued operation of their . . . businesses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brennan v. Carrasco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.