Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 F.2d 11 - Schantz v. Eyman

Schantz v. Eyman’s Empirical Analysis

418 F.2d 11 · 1969

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2000 · most notably United States v. Lemonakis (1973), United States v. Greene (1974)

16 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

19019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Massiah v. United States · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “potential substantial prejudice to defendant's rights inheres in the particular confrontation and . . .[counsel may] help avoid that prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.