Euge v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
418 F.2d 1296 · 1969
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1999
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dombrowski v. Pfister · Cameron v. Johnson · Toucey v. New York Life Insurance · Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman Bros. · Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Albright
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.