Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 418 F.2d 15 - No 26631

No 26631’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2016

1 district · 7 state decisions

80196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Miller · Dugan v. Rank · United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co. · United States v. Merz · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] company condemning land might be willing to pay more than it is worth, and the owner of the land might be willing to take less than it is worth to avoid a lawsuit. Since a landowner would prefer to reach an agreement rather than be subjected to a lawsuit by a condemnor, a sale to a company possessing the power of eminent domain is more likely to show a compromise value than the true market value of the land. It would also be to the benefit of the company to avoid a time-consuming and asset-wasting lawsuit and thus the condemnor, too, is likely to com promise and perhaps pay more than the market value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.